After yesterday’s Palin event in Springfield was such an overwhelming event, I thought I would grade the local media on their coverage. No media outlet will be spared the grades of The Albers Report. So lets get right to it, shall we.
KY3
I was most disappointed with KY3′s coverage of the event. Right or wrong KY3 has developed a reputation for being the leader in local political coverage. They are the only television station in the Ozarks that their political reporter has his own blog, The KY3 Political Notebook. In fact, they have been airing ads on their station, saying they are the place to go for political coverage.
My criticism extends on two fronts. The first being they did not air the speech live. When you try to establish yourself as the best in political coverage, you have a responsibility to live up to that standard. They failed miserably to do that. In fact, while all other local stations devoted an entire report to just the Palin rally and nothing else. David Catanese, decided to include also Claire McCaskill in the report, challenging what Gov. Palin said at the rally. He stated that Palin was mocking tax credits, when what she was doing was drawing a distinction between tax credits and across the board tax cuts, which is what our economy needs. When Sen. Biden came to Springfield the coverage was much different.
When Sen. Biden came to town Mr. Catanese did not seek out Republican elected officials to refute the claims Biden made. Mr. Catanese did not post pictures of himself in the middle of pictures of Biden like he did with the pictures he posted on his blog of the Sarah Palin rally.
It is clear Mr. Catanese’s reporting is full of everything that I have complained about in the media. Reporters that try to inject a personal political agenda instead of just sticking to the facts and letting the voters decide.
My second area of criticism with Mr. Catanese’s reporting stems from the fact that he is the only local member of the media that tried to underestimate the crowd size. On his blog he said:
"Let’s be clear: We don’t know how many people attended the Palin rally, because we didn’t count. Nobody did as far as I can tell. But 20,000 — to us — seemed like a bit over the top. Where’d the cars park? Can 20,000 really even fit in that parking lot?"
"We guesstimated around 10 thousand, maybe 12 thousand. But twenty?"
Obviously, Mr. Catanese did not bother to look around, and noticed people parked as far as a mile away, and didn’t notice that people were not allowed into the designated rally area because it was too crowded. He also does not notice the city Fire Marshall who said the crowd was at least 18,000.
My grade: F
KSPR-33
One the whole KSPR, did a very good job covering the Palin event. While they did not broadcast the event live on television, they were the only local television station to stream the event live on the internet. They were also the first station to have video on their website. You can find it here.
On the whole, their coverage was good. I will give them an A-, because I would have liked to see them air the speech live.
KOLR-10
I was disappointed with KOLR 10′s coverage of the event. While they did speak with some folks that were at the rally, they did not post video on their website with the full content of Palin’s speech. I thought their coverage overall was fair. They earn a C+.
KSGF
By far the best coverage of the Palin rally came through a radio station, KSGF. They established themselves as the place to go for political news. The not just aired the speech in its entirety, but also took listener calls after the event. They also posted the audio in their podcast section. You can find that at KSGF.
My grade: A+
All in all, most of the local media covered the Palin rally fair and equally, with the lone exception of KY3 news and David Catanese.